ranks

[Baluski]

thats a bad idea.. someone could leave their computer on this screen... and then it would count... BAD IDEA

Wrong. Take a look at the stats needed to rank up on the Adult Swim forums and maybe you'll catch my drift. I Know this is only possible with certain forums, but it's one of the best ways I've seen of ranking. (I've been a member for 3 years and have only reached Swim SuperStar, mostly because I refrain from spamming)


SwimNewbie: Initial rank [unable to post new threads]

SwimShady: Registration date older than 2 days (48 hours)

SwimPunk: 54 Posts, 120 Minutes Online, and registration date older than 7 days (approx. 1 week)Per Day Stats: 7.71 posts, 17.14 minutes. (All rounded to nearest hundredths)

SwimVoyeur: 1,500 Minutes Online, 2,001 Page Views, and registration date older than 7 days (approx. 1 week)Per Day Stats: 214.29 minutes, 285.86 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)

SwimScenester: 253 Posts, 1,500 Minutes Online, 2,378 Page Views, and registration date older than 30 days (approx. 1 month)Per Day Stats: 8.43 posts, 50 minutes, 79.27 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)

SwimFan: 518 Posts, 5,000 Minutes Online, 8,997 Page Views, and registration date older than 90 days (approx. 3 months)Per Day Stats: 5.76 posts, 55.56 minutes, 99.97 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)

SwimVIP: 1,011 Posts, 6,000 Minutes Online, 15,003 Page Views, and registration date older than 180 days (approx. 6 months)Per Day Stats: 5.62 posts, 33.33 minutes, 83.35 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)

SwimStar: 2,016 Posts, 7,052 Minutes Online, 20,700 Page Views, and registration date older than 270 days (approx. 9 months)Per Day Stats: 7.47 posts, 26.12 minutes, 76.67 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)

SwimSuperStar: 4,989 Posts, 9,106 Minutes Online, 42,343 Page Views, and registration date older than 365 days (approx. 1 year)Per Day Stats: 13.67 posts, 24.95 minutes, 116.01 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)

SwimIcon: 9,287 Posts, 12,522 Minutes Online, 74,115 Page Views, and registration date older than 450 days (approx. 1 year, 3 months)Per Day Stats: 20.64 posts, 27.83 minutes, 164.7 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)

SwimLegend: 16,333 Posts, 21,500 Minutes Online, 130,899 Page Views, and registration date older than 548 days (approx. 1.5 years)Per Day Stats: 29.8 posts, 39.23 minutes, 238.87 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)

Order of the Owl: 25,666 Posts, 44,851 Minutes Online, 252,195 Page Views, and registration date older than 720 days (approx. 2 years)Per Day Stats: 35.65 posts, 62.29 minutes, 350.27 pages views.
(All rounded to nearest hundredths)


@Toshiro Hitsugaia: This isn't a chat forum, for is a place for prospective ideas and overall reviews from a players aspect. =)

[Chaoskin]

Someone go count how many times he said go nel or somthing like that

[aronshadowblade]

thats a good point. the main prob. with the time one, like I said, are people who leave their screen on this site for NO REASON

[Toshiro Hitsugaia]

that would be a waste of power

[Neji]

I can, without major modifications, only rely on post count Oo

[Chaoskin]

Yea you can make it so posts in certain areas dont count so only posts in serious areas would count

Thats how must forums I go on work and then to be mod its always 18 and older which i hated, one website when I turned 18 they made me mod right away after i passed there test, and then owners said mods were all bad and deleted all are accounts

[Jin]

I like the current ranks, and I agree that the posts in certain areas should not count.
but the bad thing is  that if those areas didn't count then people could do more spam in important areas and topics.

[Toshiro Hitsugaia]

exactly so why even have this conversation of posts

[Hitsugaya-Taicho]

I like the current ranks, and I agree that the posts in certain areas should not count.

I support this idea.

but the bad thing is that if those areas didn't count then people could do more spam in important areas and topics.

Further spamming should result to banishment. 

[Toshiro Hitsugaia]

but the bad thing is that if those areas didn't count then people could do more spam in important areas and topics.

Further spamming should result to banishment. 
[/quote]

Spamming already does result in punishment 1st a waning then another then 3rd strike a ban depending on how long he feels likev making it

[aronshadowblade]

well, ranks do make people want to post more, in my opinion

[Hitsugaya-Taicho]

Just don't count the post that are in the Spam area, it makes people want to spam more in my opinion. 

[Toshiro Hitsugaia]

Spam are=Place to spam so i must agree completly

[Hitsugaya-Taicho]

Yes, that's why it should not be counted. 

[Toshiro Hitsugaia]

i would only lose300 posts if those were ignored but i think the real problem here is

why do people care aout post amount and karma

its not that important since ainly mods only have more + then -